↓ Skip to main content

A proposal to sequence the genome of a garter snake (Thamnophis sirtalis)

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Microbiome, April 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
72 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A proposal to sequence the genome of a garter snake (Thamnophis sirtalis)
Published in
Environmental Microbiome, April 2011
DOI 10.4056/sigs.1664145
Pubmed ID
Authors

Todd A. Castoe, Anne M. Bronikowski, Edmund D. Brodie, Scott V. Edwards, Michael E. Pfrender, Michael D. Shapiro, David D. Pollock, Wesley C. Warren

Abstract

Here we develop an argument in support of sequencing a garter snake (Thamnophis sirtalis) genome, and outline a plan to accomplish this. This snake is a common, widespread, nonvenomous North American species that has served as a model for diverse studies in evolutionary biology, physiology, genomics, behavior and coevolution. The anole lizard is currently the only genome sequence available for a non-avian reptile. Thus, the garter snake at this time would be the first available snake genome sequence and as such would provide much needed comparative representation of non-avian reptilian genomes, and would also allow critical new insights for vertebrate comparative genomic studies. We outline the major areas of discovery that the availability of the garter snake genome would enable, and describe a plan for whole-genome sequencing.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Sudan 1 1%
Chile 1 1%
Saudi Arabia 1 1%
Mexico 1 1%
Japan 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 66 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 18 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 18%
Student > Bachelor 10 14%
Student > Master 10 14%
Professor 4 6%
Other 9 13%
Unknown 8 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 44 61%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 15%
Environmental Science 3 4%
Arts and Humanities 1 1%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 1%
Other 1 1%
Unknown 11 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 October 2018.
All research outputs
#19,945,185
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Microbiome
#546
of 786 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#105,306
of 121,781 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Microbiome
#5
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 786 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 121,781 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.