You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
| Title |
Comparing functional annotation analyses with Catmap
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Bioinformatics, December 2004
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2105-5-193 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Thomas Breslin, Patrik Edén, Morten Krogh |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 7% |
| Russia | 2 | 4% |
| France | 1 | 2% |
| Austria | 1 | 2% |
| Mexico | 1 | 2% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 2% |
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Poland | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 43 | 78% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 20 | 36% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 22% |
| Professor | 4 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 9 | 16% |
| Unknown | 3 | 5% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 27 | 49% |
| Computer Science | 7 | 13% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 11% |
| Chemistry | 3 | 5% |
| Engineering | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 7 | 13% |
| Unknown | 3 | 5% |