↓ Skip to main content

Gene set enrichment analysis of RNA-Seq data: integrating differential expression and splicing

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Bioinformatics, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
11 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
48 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
184 Mendeley
citeulike
7 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Gene set enrichment analysis of RNA-Seq data: integrating differential expression and splicing
Published in
BMC Bioinformatics, April 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2105-14-s5-s16
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xi Wang, Murray J Cairns

Abstract

RNA-Seq has become a key technology in transcriptome studies because it can quantify overall expression levels and the degree of alternative splicing for each gene simultaneously. To interpret high-throughout transcriptome profiling data, functional enrichment analysis is critical. However, existing functional analysis methods can only account for differential expression, leaving differential splicing out altogether.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 184 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 8 4%
Colombia 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Israel 1 <1%
Hong Kong 1 <1%
Egypt 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Other 2 1%
Unknown 166 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 52 28%
Student > Ph. D. Student 51 28%
Student > Master 20 11%
Student > Bachelor 12 7%
Other 7 4%
Other 25 14%
Unknown 17 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 94 51%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 26 14%
Computer Science 14 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 5%
Mathematics 4 2%
Other 13 7%
Unknown 24 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 January 2014.
All research outputs
#4,607,728
of 22,835,198 outputs
Outputs from BMC Bioinformatics
#1,756
of 7,288 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,690
of 199,763 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Bioinformatics
#32
of 135 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,835,198 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,288 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 199,763 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 135 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.