You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Poorer prognosis of ovarian squamous cell carcinoma than serous carcinoma: a propensity score matching analysis based on the SEER database
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Ovarian Research, July 2020
|
DOI | 10.1186/s13048-020-00675-y |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Cheng Zhang, Tai Ma |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 10 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 50% |
Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 20% |
Student > Master | 1 | 10% |
Unknown | 2 | 20% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 50% |
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 10% |
Social Sciences | 1 | 10% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 10% |
Unknown | 2 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 August 2022.
All research outputs
#4,248,133
of 23,122,481 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Ovarian Research
#56
of 604 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#104,705
of 398,274 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Ovarian Research
#3
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,122,481 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 604 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 398,274 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.