You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Correction: Characterizing the neurological phenotype of the hyperinsulinism hyperammonemia syndrome
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, August 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13023-022-02466-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Elizabeth Rosenfeld, Ravi Prakash Reddy Nanga, Alfredo Lucas, Andrew Y. Revell, Allison Thomas, Nina H. Thomas, David R. Roalf, Russell T. Shinohara, Ravinder Reddy, Kathryn A. Davis, Diva D. De León |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 August 2022.
All research outputs
#18,009,288
of 23,130,383 outputs
Outputs from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#2,041
of 2,649 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#282,038
of 433,799 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#66
of 103 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,130,383 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,649 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 433,799 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 103 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.