↓ Skip to main content

An ethnomethodological approach to examine exploitation in the context of capacity, trust and experience of commercial surrogacy in India

Overview of attention for article published in Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
50 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
97 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
An ethnomethodological approach to examine exploitation in the context of capacity, trust and experience of commercial surrogacy in India
Published in
Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine, August 2013
DOI 10.1186/1747-5341-8-10
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sheela Saravanan

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Indonesia 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Unknown 95 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 22 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 13%
Student > Bachelor 8 8%
Researcher 7 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 5%
Other 17 18%
Unknown 25 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 23 24%
Psychology 13 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 4 4%
Other 11 11%
Unknown 32 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 May 2024.
All research outputs
#15,467,248
of 25,826,146 outputs
Outputs from Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine
#177
of 236 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#115,534
of 211,108 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine
#7
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,826,146 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 236 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.1. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 211,108 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.