You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Deconstructing design thinking as a tool for the implementation of a population health initiative
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Health Research Policy and Systems, August 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12961-022-00892-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Caitlin Jarrett, Yara C. Baxter, Johannes Boch, Conrado Carrasco, Daniel Cobos Muñoz, Karina Mauro Dib, Lara Pessoa, Jasmina Saric, Mariana Silveira, Peter Steinmann |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 2 | 67% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 49 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 7 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 6% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 6% |
| Lecturer | 2 | 4% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 5 | 10% |
| Unknown | 27 | 55% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Design | 4 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 6% |
| Arts and Humanities | 2 | 4% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 7 | 14% |
| Unknown | 29 | 59% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 August 2022.
All research outputs
#14,458,287
of 23,164,913 outputs
Outputs from Health Research Policy and Systems
#1,034
of 1,230 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#201,632
of 435,041 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health Research Policy and Systems
#20
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,164,913 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,230 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.1. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 435,041 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.