You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The influence of cross-regional medical treatment on total medical expenses, medical insurance payments, and out-of-pocket expenses of patients with malignant tumors in Chinese low-income areas
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation, July 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12962-022-00368-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Bokai Zhang, Haixin Wang, Hongyu Zhang, Guomei Tian, Ting Zhang, Qi Shi, Jian Liu, Jinpeng Xu, Jingchu Liu, Qunhong Wu, Zheng Kang |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 13 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Lecturer | 2 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 15% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 8% |
| Researcher | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 7 | 54% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 15% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 8% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 8% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 8 | 62% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 December 2023.
All research outputs
#5,013,742
of 25,038,941 outputs
Outputs from Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation
#167
of 510 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#94,835
of 427,346 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation
#2
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,038,941 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 510 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 427,346 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 8 of them.