You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
An experimental hut study evaluating the impact of pyrethroid-only and PBO nets alone and in combination with pirimiphos-methyl-based IRS in Ethiopia
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Malaria Journal, August 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12936-022-04263-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Delenasaw Yewhalaw, Meshesha Balkew, Endalew Zemene, Sheleme Chibsa, Peter Mumba, Cecilia Flatley, Aklilu Seyoum, Melissa Yoshimizu, Sarah Zohdy, Dereje Dengela, Seth Irish |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 5 | 83% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 50% |
| Scientists | 2 | 33% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 30 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 6 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 7% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 10% |
| Unknown | 13 | 43% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 3 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 7% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 6 | 20% |
| Unknown | 13 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 September 2022.
All research outputs
#5,980,714
of 24,554,073 outputs
Outputs from Malaria Journal
#1,386
of 5,780 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#106,701
of 422,262 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Malaria Journal
#26
of 71 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,554,073 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,780 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 422,262 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 71 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.