You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
α-Gal antigen-deficient rabbits with GGTA1 gene disruption via CRISPR/Cas9
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Genomic Data, July 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12863-022-01068-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lina Wei, Yufeng Mu, Jichao Deng, Yong Wu, Ying Qiao, Kun Zhang, Xuewen Wang, Wenpeng Huang, Anliang Shao, Liang Chen, Yang Zhang, Zhanjun Li, Liangxue Lai, Shuxin Qu, Liming Xu |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 67% |
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 August 2022.
All research outputs
#14,449,295
of 23,146,350 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomic Data
#33
of 106 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#205,067
of 435,452 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomic Data
#7
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,146,350 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 106 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 435,452 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.