You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Diaphragm ultrasound evaluation during weaning from mechanical ventilation in COVID-19 patients: a pragmatic, cross-section, multicenter study
|
---|---|
Published in |
Respiratory Research, August 2022
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12931-022-02138-y |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Luigi Vetrugno, Daniele Orso, Francesco Corradi, Gianluca Zani, Savino Spadaro, Francesco Meroi, Natascia D’Andrea, Tiziana Bove, Gianmaria Cammarota, Edoardo De Robertis, Samuele Ferrari, Marcello Guarnieri, Margherita Ajuti, Maurizio Fusari, Domenico Luca Grieco, Cristian Deana, Enrico Boero, Federico Franchi, Sabino Scolletta, Salvatore Maurizio Maggiore, Francesco Forfori |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 36 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Mexico | 6 | 17% |
Italy | 3 | 8% |
Argentina | 2 | 6% |
Colombia | 2 | 6% |
Spain | 2 | 6% |
Brazil | 1 | 3% |
Guatemala | 1 | 3% |
Malaysia | 1 | 3% |
United States | 1 | 3% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 17 | 47% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 30 | 83% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 11% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Scientists | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 37 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 16% |
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 14% |
Other | 3 | 8% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 8% |
Researcher | 2 | 5% |
Other | 5 | 14% |
Unknown | 13 | 35% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 32% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 11% |
Engineering | 3 | 8% |
Unspecified | 1 | 3% |
Social Sciences | 1 | 3% |
Other | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 15 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2024.
All research outputs
#1,989,066
of 25,791,495 outputs
Outputs from Respiratory Research
#185
of 3,113 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,392
of 432,347 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Respiratory Research
#12
of 79 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,791,495 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,113 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 432,347 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 79 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.