You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Optimising care and follow-up of adults with achondroplasia
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, August 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13023-022-02479-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Svein Fredwall, Yana Allum, Moeenaldeen AlSayed, Inês Alves, Tawfeg Ben-Omran, Silvio Boero, Valerie Cormier-Daire, Encarna Guillen-Navarro, Melita Irving, Christian Lampe, Mohamad Maghnie, Klaus Mohnike, Geert Mortier, Sérgio B. Sousa, Michael Wright |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | 17% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 17% |
| Spain | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 3 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 22 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 3 | 14% |
| Researcher | 2 | 9% |
| Lecturer | 2 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 5% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 13 | 59% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 14% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 9% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 5% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 5% |
| Engineering | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 14 | 64% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 September 2022.
All research outputs
#7,101,109
of 23,376,718 outputs
Outputs from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#1,007
of 2,684 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#132,449
of 435,139 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#21
of 105 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,376,718 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,684 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 435,139 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 105 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.