↓ Skip to main content

FMR1, circadian genes and depression: suggestive associations or false discovery?

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Circadian Rhythms, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#36 of 103)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
FMR1, circadian genes and depression: suggestive associations or false discovery?
Published in
Journal of Circadian Rhythms, March 2013
DOI 10.1186/1740-3391-11-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Daniel F Kripke, Caroline M Nievergelt, Gregory J Tranah, Sarah S Murray, Katharine M Rex, Alexandra P Grizas, Elizabeth K Hahn, Heon-Jeong Lee, John R Kelsoe, Lawrence E Kline

Abstract

There are several indications that malfunctions of the circadian clock contribute to depression. To search for particular circadian gene polymorphisms associated with depression, diverse polymorphisms were genotyped in two samples covering a range of depressed volunteers and participants with normal mood.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 3%
Unknown 36 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 7 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 11%
Student > Master 4 11%
Professor 3 8%
Other 3 8%
Other 10 27%
Unknown 6 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 27%
Neuroscience 6 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 8%
Psychology 3 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 5%
Other 5 14%
Unknown 8 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 July 2015.
All research outputs
#6,207,364
of 22,703,044 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Circadian Rhythms
#36
of 103 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,325
of 197,511 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Circadian Rhythms
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,703,044 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 103 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 197,511 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them