You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
How is physicians’ implicit prejudice against the obese and mentally ill moderated by specialty and experience?
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Medical Ethics, August 2022
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12910-022-00815-7 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Chloë FitzGerald, Christian Mumenthaler, Delphine Berner, Mélinée Schindler, Tobias Brosch, Samia Hurst |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 14% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 14% |
France | 1 | 14% |
Spain | 1 | 14% |
Unknown | 3 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 4 | 57% |
Scientists | 2 | 29% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 30 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 4 | 13% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 7% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 7% |
Student > Master | 2 | 7% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 7% |
Other | 2 | 7% |
Unknown | 16 | 53% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Psychology | 6 | 20% |
Arts and Humanities | 2 | 7% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 7% |
Social Sciences | 2 | 7% |
Philosophy | 1 | 3% |
Other | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 16 | 53% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 September 2022.
All research outputs
#7,568,897
of 24,527,858 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Ethics
#628
of 1,056 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#136,893
of 420,875 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Ethics
#14
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,527,858 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,056 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 420,875 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.