↓ Skip to main content

Salivary cortisol, dehydroepiandrosteronesulphate (DHEA–S) and testosterone in women with chronic migraine

Overview of attention for article published in The Journal of Headache and Pain, March 2006
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
41 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
68 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Salivary cortisol, dehydroepiandrosteronesulphate (DHEA–S) and testosterone in women with chronic migraine
Published in
The Journal of Headache and Pain, March 2006
DOI 10.1007/s10194-006-0274-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

F. R. Patacchioli, P. Monnazzi, S. Simeoni, S. De Filippis, E. Salvatori, G. Coloprisco, P. Martelletti

Abstract

Hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis activity was monitored in 20 women with chronic migraine (CM), previously affected by medication overuse headache (MOH), in comparison to healthy women (20 subjects) by measuring salivary cortisol, testosterone, dehydroepiandrosterone-sulphate (DHEA-S) levels, and their ratios, one week after the end of the MOH rehabilitation procedure. The participants were instructed how to collect saliva samples at home, a procedure that was performed twice a day (08:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m.). Morning and evening levels of cortisol were significantly increased in CM patients with respect to controls. With regard to the cortisol/DHEA-S ratio, an inverse marker of psycho-physical wellbeing, CM women showed significantly higher values than controls. Moreover, testosterone/cortisol ratios (anabolic/catabolic index of physical performance) were significantly lower in CM patients than in controls. In the present study, CM appears not to be associated with an impairment of cortisol and DHEAS circadian fluctuation; however, CM patients present alterations in HPA axis function that might contribute to metabolic and psychological alterations that have also been associated with CM.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Australia 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 65 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 16%
Student > Bachelor 8 12%
Researcher 5 7%
Student > Master 5 7%
Professor 5 7%
Other 16 24%
Unknown 18 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 24%
Neuroscience 6 9%
Psychology 5 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 6%
Other 11 16%
Unknown 22 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 March 2013.
All research outputs
#21,186,729
of 23,849,058 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of Headache and Pain
#1,311
of 1,417 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#65,859
of 67,807 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of Headache and Pain
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,849,058 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,417 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 67,807 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.