You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Correction: A non‑invasive nanoparticles for multimodal imaging of ischemic myocardium in rats
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Nanobiotechnology, August 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12951-022-01588-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Xiajing Chen, Yanan Zhang, Hui Zhang, Liang Zhang, Lingjuan Liu, Yang Cao, Haitao Ran, Jie Tian |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 August 2022.
All research outputs
#18,709,638
of 23,189,371 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Nanobiotechnology
#931
of 1,465 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#299,128
of 432,288 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Nanobiotechnology
#69
of 105 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,189,371 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,465 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 432,288 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 105 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.