↓ Skip to main content

Evaluating the integration of chronic disease prevention and management services into primary health care

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Health Services Research, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
38 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
372 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Evaluating the integration of chronic disease prevention and management services into primary health care
Published in
BMC Health Services Research, April 2013
DOI 10.1186/1472-6963-13-132
Pubmed ID
Authors

Martin Fortin, Maud-Christine Chouinard, Tarek Bouhali, Marie-France Dubois, Cynthia Gagnon, Martin Bélanger

Abstract

The increasing number of patients with chronic diseases represents a challenge for health care systems. The Chronic Care Model suggests a multi-component remodelling of chronic disease services to improve patient outcomes. To meet the complex and ongoing needs of patients, chronic disease prevention and management (CDPM) has been advocated as a key feature of primary care producing better outcomes, greater effectiveness and improved access to services compared to other sectors. The objective of this study is to evaluate the adaptation and implementation of an intervention involving the integration of chronic disease prevention and management (CDPM) services into primary health care.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 372 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 2 <1%
Burkina Faso 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Romania 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 361 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 64 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 52 14%
Student > Bachelor 36 10%
Researcher 31 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 25 7%
Other 81 22%
Unknown 83 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 109 29%
Nursing and Health Professions 56 15%
Psychology 35 9%
Social Sciences 21 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 8 2%
Other 47 13%
Unknown 96 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 March 2021.
All research outputs
#2,360,087
of 22,705,019 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#966
of 7,593 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,865
of 199,277 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#19
of 93 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,705,019 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,593 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 199,277 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 93 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.