↓ Skip to main content

Evaluating the integration of chronic disease prevention and management services into primary health care

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Health Services Research, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
6 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
343 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Evaluating the integration of chronic disease prevention and management services into primary health care
Published in
BMC Health Services Research, April 2013
DOI 10.1186/1472-6963-13-132
Pubmed ID
Authors

Martin Fortin, Maud-Christine Chouinard, Tarek Bouhali, Marie-France Dubois, Cynthia Gagnon, Martin Bélanger

Abstract

The increasing number of patients with chronic diseases represents a challenge for health care systems. The Chronic Care Model suggests a multi-component remodelling of chronic disease services to improve patient outcomes. To meet the complex and ongoing needs of patients, chronic disease prevention and management (CDPM) has been advocated as a key feature of primary care producing better outcomes, greater effectiveness and improved access to services compared to other sectors. The objective of this study is to evaluate the adaptation and implementation of an intervention involving the integration of chronic disease prevention and management (CDPM) services into primary health care.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 343 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 2 <1%
Burkina Faso 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Romania 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 332 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 62 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 51 15%
Student > Bachelor 36 10%
Researcher 31 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 24 7%
Other 75 22%
Unknown 64 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 105 31%
Nursing and Health Professions 53 15%
Psychology 36 10%
Social Sciences 21 6%
Engineering 8 2%
Other 44 13%
Unknown 76 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 March 2021.
All research outputs
#2,104,831
of 20,610,267 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#854
of 6,895 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,962
of 172,604 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#1
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 20,610,267 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,895 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 172,604 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them