You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Building a virtual community of practice: experience from the Canadian foundation for healthcare improvement’s policy circle
|
---|---|
Published in |
Health Research Policy and Systems, September 2022
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12961-022-00897-0 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Shannon L. Sibbald, Maddison L. Burnet, Bill Callery, Jonathan I. Mitchell |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 3 | 38% |
Spain | 1 | 13% |
Canada | 1 | 13% |
Australia | 1 | 13% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 13% |
Unknown | 1 | 13% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 38% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 25% |
Scientists | 2 | 25% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 53 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 5 | 9% |
Researcher | 5 | 9% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 6% |
Unspecified | 2 | 4% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 4% |
Other | 4 | 8% |
Unknown | 32 | 60% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Social Sciences | 7 | 13% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 6% |
Unspecified | 2 | 4% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 4% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 4% |
Other | 3 | 6% |
Unknown | 34 | 64% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 September 2022.
All research outputs
#7,846,128
of 23,796,227 outputs
Outputs from Health Research Policy and Systems
#865
of 1,248 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#145,893
of 433,585 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health Research Policy and Systems
#19
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,796,227 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,248 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.1. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 433,585 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.