You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Discomfort improvement for critically ill patients using electronic relaxation devices: results of the cross-over randomized controlled trial E-CHOISIR (Electronic-CHOIce of a System for Intensive care Relaxation)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, September 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13054-022-04136-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lili Merliot-Gailhoustet, Chloé Raimbert, Océane Garnier, Julie Carr, Audrey De Jong, Nicolas Molinari, Samir Jaber, Gerald Chanques |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 80 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 13 | 16% |
| United Kingdom | 11 | 14% |
| France | 4 | 5% |
| Italy | 3 | 4% |
| Germany | 3 | 4% |
| Canada | 2 | 3% |
| Brazil | 2 | 3% |
| Hungary | 1 | 1% |
| Mexico | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 9 | 11% |
| Unknown | 31 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 55 | 69% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 16 | 20% |
| Scientists | 7 | 9% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 76 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Professor > Associate Professor | 6 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 7% |
| Researcher | 4 | 5% |
| Lecturer | 3 | 4% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 9 | 12% |
| Unknown | 46 | 61% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 16% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 9% |
| Arts and Humanities | 3 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 1% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 4 | 5% |
| Unknown | 48 | 63% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 66. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 October 2022.
All research outputs
#659,624
of 25,641,627 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#447
of 6,596 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,953
of 432,265 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#13
of 90 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,641,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,596 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 432,265 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 90 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.