You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Elevated CSF and plasma complement proteins in genetic frontotemporal dementia: results from the GENFI study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Neuroinflammation, September 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12974-022-02573-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Emma L. van der Ende, Carolin Heller, Aitana Sogorb-Esteve, Imogen J. Swift, David McFall, Georgia Peakman, Arabella Bouzigues, Jackie M. Poos, Lize C. Jiskoot, Jessica L. Panman, Janne M. Papma, Lieke H. Meeter, Elise G. P. Dopper, Martina Bocchetta, Emily Todd, David Cash, Caroline Graff, Matthis Synofzik, Fermin Moreno, Elizabeth Finger, Raquel Sanchez-Valle, Rik Vandenberghe, Robert Laforce, Mario Masellis, Maria Carmela Tartaglia, James B. Rowe, Chris Butler, Simon Ducharme, Alexander Gerhard, Adrian Danek, Johannes Levin, Yolande A. L. Pijnenburg, Markus Otto, Barbara Borroni, Fabrizio Tagliavini, Alexandre de Mendonça, Isabel Santana, Daniela Galimberti, Sandro Sorbi, Henrik Zetterberg, Eric Huang, John C. van Swieten, Jonathan D. Rohrer, Harro Seelaar |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Italy | 2 | 25% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 13% |
| India | 1 | 13% |
| United States | 1 | 13% |
| Spain | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 2 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 75% |
| Scientists | 1 | 13% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 36 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 17% |
| Other | 3 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 8% |
| Other | 3 | 8% |
| Unknown | 15 | 42% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 9 | 25% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 14% |
| Psychology | 2 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 6% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 16 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 September 2022.
All research outputs
#2,649,169
of 24,653,581 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neuroinflammation
#383
of 2,846 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,878
of 423,800 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neuroinflammation
#8
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,653,581 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,846 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 423,800 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.