↓ Skip to main content

Impact of IDH1 and IDH2 mutational subgroups in AML patients after allogeneic stem cell transplantation

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Hematology & Oncology, September 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (54th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Impact of IDH1 and IDH2 mutational subgroups in AML patients after allogeneic stem cell transplantation
Published in
Journal of Hematology & Oncology, September 2022
DOI 10.1186/s13045-022-01339-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Desiree Kunadt, Sebastian Stasik, Klaus H. Metzeler, Christoph Röllig, Christoph Schliemann, Philipp A. Greif, Karsten Spiekermann, Maja Rothenberg-Thurley, Utz Krug, Jan Braess, Alwin Krämer, Andreas Hochhaus, Sebastian Scholl, Inken Hilgendorf, Tim H. Brümmendorf, Edgar Jost, Björn Steffen, Gesine Bug, Hermann Einsele, Dennis Görlich, Cristina Sauerland, Kerstin Schäfer-Eckart, Stefan W. Krause, Mathias Hänel, Maher Hanoun, Martin Kaufmann, Bernhard Wörmann, Michael Kramer, Katja Sockel, Katharina Egger-Heidrich, Tobias Herold, Gerhard Ehninger, Andreas Burchert, Uwe Platzbecker, Wolfgang E. Berdel, Carsten Müller-Tidow, Wolfgang Hiddemann, Hubert Serve, Matthias Stelljes, Claudia D. Baldus, Andreas Neubauer, Johannes Schetelig, Christian Thiede, Martin Bornhäuser, Jan M. Middeke, Friedrich Stölzel

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 20 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 3 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 10%
Researcher 2 10%
Student > Postgraduate 2 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 9 45%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 5%
Physics and Astronomy 1 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 9 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 September 2022.
All research outputs
#14,553,484
of 24,417,958 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Hematology & Oncology
#704
of 1,262 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#184,470
of 421,979 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Hematology & Oncology
#24
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,417,958 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,262 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.8. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 421,979 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.