You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Maternal nutritional risk factors for pre-eclampsia incidence: findings from a narrative scoping review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Reproductive Health, September 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12978-022-01485-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mai-Lei Woo Kinshella, Shazmeen Omar, Kerri Scherbinsky, Marianne Vidler, Laura A. Magee, Peter von Dadelszen, Sophie E. Moore, Rajavel Elango, Peter von Dadelszen, Laura A. Magee, Lucilla Poston, Hiten D. Mistry, Marie-Laure Volvert, Cristina Escalona Lopez, Sophie Moore, Rachel Tribe, Andrew Shennan, Tatiana Salisbury, Lucy Chappell, Rachel Craik, Marleen Temmerman, Angela Koech Etyang, Sikolia Wanyonyi, Geoffrey Omuse, Patricia Okiro, Grace Mwashigadi, Esperança Sevene, Helena Boene, Corssino Tchavana, Eusebio Macete, Carla Carillho, Lazaro Quimice, Sonia Maculuve, Donna Russell, Ben Baratt, Joy Lawn, Hannah Blencowe, Veronique Filippi, Matt Silver, Prestige Tatenda Makanga, Liberty Makacha, Yolisa Dube, Newton Nyapwere, Reason Mlambo, Umberto D’Alessandro, Anna Roca, Melisa Martinez-Alvarez, Hawanatu Jah, Brahima Diallo, Abdul Karim Sesay, Fatima Touray, Abdoulie Sillah, Alison Noble, Aris Papageorghiou, Judith Cartwright, Guy Whitley, Sanjeev Krishna, Rosemarie Townsend, Asma Khalil, Marianne Vidler, Joel Singer, Jing Li, Jeffrey Bone, Mai-Lei Woo Kinshella, Kelly Pickerill, Ash Sandhu, Tu Domena, Rajavel Elango, William Stones |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 5 | 28% |
| United States | 2 | 11% |
| Bangladesh | 1 | 6% |
| Belgium | 1 | 6% |
| Spain | 1 | 6% |
| Germany | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 7 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 13 | 72% |
| Scientists | 3 | 17% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 79 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 6% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 4% |
| Researcher | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 6 | 8% |
| Unknown | 47 | 59% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 6% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 4% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 12 | 15% |
| Unknown | 45 | 57% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 January 2023.
All research outputs
#2,988,817
of 24,692,658 outputs
Outputs from Reproductive Health
#331
of 1,519 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61,057
of 424,065 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Reproductive Health
#9
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,692,658 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,519 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 424,065 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.