You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Effects of a mindfulness-based versus a health self-management intervention on objective cognitive performance in older adults with subjective cognitive decline (SCD): a secondary analysis of the SCD-Well randomized controlled trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Alzheimer's Research & Therapy, September 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13195-022-01057-w |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tim Whitfield, Harriet Demnitz-King, Marco Schlosser, Thorsten Barnhofer, Eric Frison, Nina Coll-Padros, Sophie Dautricourt, Florence Requier, Marion Delarue, Julie Gonneaud, Olga M. Klimecki, Antoine Lutz, Léo Paly, Eric Salmon, Ann-Katrin Schild, Zuzana Walker, Frank Jessen, Gaël Chételat, Fabienne Collette, Miranka Wirth, Natalie L. Marchant |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 7 | 30% |
| France | 3 | 13% |
| United States | 2 | 9% |
| Canada | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 10 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 18 | 78% |
| Scientists | 3 | 13% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 70 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 7 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 6% |
| Lecturer | 3 | 4% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 4% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 7 | 10% |
| Unknown | 43 | 61% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 8 | 11% |
| Unspecified | 7 | 10% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 6% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 43 | 61% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 July 2023.
All research outputs
#1,484,285
of 24,171,511 outputs
Outputs from Alzheimer's Research & Therapy
#219
of 1,339 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,421
of 420,171 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Alzheimer's Research & Therapy
#8
of 60 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,171,511 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,339 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 420,171 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 60 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.