↓ Skip to main content

Urticaria and infections

Overview of attention for article published in Allergy, Asthma & Clinical Immunology, December 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
145 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
127 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Urticaria and infections
Published in
Allergy, Asthma & Clinical Immunology, December 2009
DOI 10.1186/1710-1492-5-10
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bettina Wedi, Ulrike Raap, Dorothea Wieczorek, Alexander Kapp

Abstract

Urticaria is a group of diseases that share a distinct skin reaction pattern. Triggering of urticaria by infections has been discussed for many years but the exact role and pathogenesis of mast cell activation by infectious processes is unclear. In spontaneous acute urticaria there is no doubt for a causal relationship to infections and all chronic urticaria must have started as acute. Whereas in physical or distinct urticaria subtypes the evidence for infections is sparse, remission of annoying spontaneous chronic urticaria has been reported after successful treatment of persistent infections. Current summarizing available studies that evaluated the course of the chronic urticaria after proven Helicobacter eradication demonstrate a statistically significant benefit compared to untreated patients or Helicobacter-negative controls without urticaria (p < 0.001). Since infections can be easily treated some diagnostic procedures should be included in the routine work-up, especially the search for Helicobacter pylori. This review will update the reader regarding the role of infections in different urticaria subtypes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 127 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 2 2%
Unknown 125 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 19 15%
Student > Postgraduate 19 15%
Student > Master 14 11%
Student > Bachelor 13 10%
Other 13 10%
Other 20 16%
Unknown 29 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 71 56%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 3%
Psychology 2 2%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 2%
Other 8 6%
Unknown 33 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 October 2020.
All research outputs
#6,897,536
of 25,795,662 outputs
Outputs from Allergy, Asthma & Clinical Immunology
#360
of 930 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,764
of 179,385 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Allergy, Asthma & Clinical Immunology
#6
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,795,662 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 930 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 179,385 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.