↓ Skip to main content

The Australian longitudinal study on male health-methods

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, October 2016
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
47 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
77 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Australian longitudinal study on male health-methods
Published in
BMC Public Health, October 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12889-016-3698-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dianne Currier, Jane Pirkis, John Carlin, Louisa Degenhardt, Shyamali C. Dharmage, Billie Giles-Corti, Ian Gordon, Lyle Gurrin, Jane Hocking, Anne Kavanagh, Louise A. Keogh, Rachel Koelmeyer, Anthony D. LaMontagne, Marisa Schlichthorst, George Patton, Lena Sanci, Matthew J. Spittal, David M. Studdert, Joanne Williams, Dallas R. English

Abstract

The Australian Longitudinal Study on Male Health (Ten to Men) was established in 2011 to build the evidence base on male health to inform policy and program development. Ten to Men is a national longitudinal study with a stratified multi-stage cluster random sample design and oversampling in rural and regional areas. Household recruitment was conducted from October 2013 to July 2014. Males who were aged 10 to 55 years residing in private dwellings were eligible to participate. Data were collected via self-completion paper questionnaires (participants aged 15 to 55) and by computer-assisted personal interview (boys aged 10 to 14). Household and proxy health data for boys were collected from a parent via a self-completion paper-based questionnaire. Questions covered socio-demographics, health status, mental health and wellbeing, health behaviours, social determinants, and health knowledge and service use. A cohort of 15,988 males aged between 10 and 55 years was recruited representing a response fraction of 35 %. Ten to Men is a unique resource for investigating male health and wellbeing. Wave 1 data are available for approved research projects.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 77 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 14%
Researcher 6 8%
Student > Master 6 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 6%
Lecturer 4 5%
Other 17 22%
Unknown 28 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 8%
Social Sciences 5 6%
Psychology 4 5%
Sports and Recreations 3 4%
Other 13 17%
Unknown 32 42%