↓ Skip to main content

Pathogenic somatic alterations of DDR genes in lung cancer are significantly different from germline mutations and are associated with more unstable genomes

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Translational Medicine, September 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Pathogenic somatic alterations of DDR genes in lung cancer are significantly different from germline mutations and are associated with more unstable genomes
Published in
Journal of Translational Medicine, September 2022
DOI 10.1186/s12967-022-03577-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Huaqing Wang, Yue Zhao, Fei Wang, Xiaofeng Zhu, Ningning Luo, Tingting Sun, Chuang Qi, Xin Li

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 December 2022.
All research outputs
#3,275,254
of 23,243,271 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Translational Medicine
#535
of 4,091 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#68,120
of 434,764 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Translational Medicine
#14
of 118 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,243,271 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,091 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 434,764 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 118 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.