You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Co-creation using crowdsourcing to promote PrEP adherence in China: study protocol for a stepped-wedge randomized controlled trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, September 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12889-022-14117-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yongjie Sha, Chunyan Li, Yuan Xiong, Aniruddha Hazra, Jonathan Lio, Ivy Jiang, Haojie Huang, Jared Kerman, Jannelle Molina, Linghua Li, Ke Liang, Dandan Gong, Quanmin Li, Songjie Wu, Renslow Sherer, Joseph D. Tucker, Weiming Tang |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 54 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 6 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 7% |
| Lecturer | 4 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 7% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 7 | 13% |
| Unknown | 26 | 48% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 5 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 9% |
| Unspecified | 4 | 7% |
| Psychology | 3 | 6% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 5 | 9% |
| Unknown | 29 | 54% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 September 2022.
All research outputs
#14,545,040
of 23,292,144 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#10,566
of 15,182 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#202,867
of 435,405 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#227
of 388 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,292,144 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,182 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 435,405 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 388 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.