↓ Skip to main content

Tracing glacial refugia of Triturus newts based on mitochondrial DNA phylogeography and species distribution modeling

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Zoology, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
92 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
163 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Tracing glacial refugia of Triturus newts based on mitochondrial DNA phylogeography and species distribution modeling
Published in
Frontiers in Zoology, March 2013
DOI 10.1186/1742-9994-10-13
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ben Wielstra, Jelka Crnobrnja-Isailović, Spartak N Litvinchuk, Bastian T Reijnen, Andrew K Skidmore, Konstantinos Sotiropoulos, Albertus G Toxopeus, Nikolay Tzankov, Tanja Vukov, Jan W Arntzen

Abstract

The major climatic oscillations during the Quaternary Ice Age heavily influenced the distribution of species and left their mark on intraspecific genetic diversity. Past range shifts can be reconstructed with the aid of species distribution modeling and phylogeographical analyses. We test the responses of the different members of the genus Triturus (i.e. the marbled and crested newts) as the climate shifted from the previous glacial period (the Last Glacial Maximum, ~21 Ka) to the current interglacial.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 163 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Romania 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Greece 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Serbia 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 153 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 32 20%
Researcher 30 18%
Student > Master 27 17%
Student > Bachelor 20 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 9 6%
Other 20 12%
Unknown 25 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 87 53%
Environmental Science 24 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 7%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 3 2%
Arts and Humanities 2 1%
Other 6 4%
Unknown 30 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 March 2016.
All research outputs
#8,261,140
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Zoology
#389
of 695 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#68,688
of 210,236 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Zoology
#10
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 695 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.9. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 210,236 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.