You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Daily cytokine fluctuations, driven by leptin, are associated with fatigue severity in chronic fatigue syndrome: evidence of inflammatory pathology
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Translational Medicine, April 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1479-5876-11-93 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Elizabeth Ann Stringer, Katharine Susanne Baker, Ian R Carroll, Jose G Montoya, Lily Chu, Holden T Maecker, Jarred W Younger |
| Abstract |
Chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) is a debilitating disorder characterized by persistent fatigue that is not alleviated by rest. The lack of a clearly identified underlying mechanism has hindered the development of effective treatments. Studies have demonstrated elevated levels of inflammatory factors in patients with CFS, but findings are contradictory across studies and no biomarkers have been consistently supported. Single time-point approaches potentially overlook important features of CFS, such as fluctuations in fatigue severity. We have observed that individuals with CFS demonstrate significant day-to-day variability in their fatigue severity. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 84 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 19 | 23% |
| United Kingdom | 15 | 18% |
| Netherlands | 6 | 7% |
| Germany | 4 | 5% |
| Spain | 1 | 1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 1% |
| Japan | 1 | 1% |
| Australia | 1 | 1% |
| Belgium | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 3 | 4% |
| Unknown | 32 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 70 | 83% |
| Scientists | 5 | 6% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 6% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 124 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 119 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 22 | 18% |
| Other | 17 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 16 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 8% |
| Other | 22 | 18% |
| Unknown | 20 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 40 | 32% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 14 | 11% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 10 | 8% |
| Psychology | 10 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 18 | 15% |
| Unknown | 26 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 85. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 May 2023.
All research outputs
#509,858
of 25,773,273 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Translational Medicine
#112
of 4,712 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,401
of 213,309 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Translational Medicine
#1
of 53 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,773,273 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,712 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 213,309 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 53 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.