You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A realist review protocol on communications for community engagement in maternal and newborn health programmes in low- and middle-income countries
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Systematic Reviews, September 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13643-022-02061-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sara Dada, Aoife De Brún, Esther Namwaba Banda, Sanghita Bhattacharya, Zaccheous Mutunga, Brynne Gilmore |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Ireland | 5 | 36% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 21% |
| India | 1 | 7% |
| Thailand | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 4 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 8 | 57% |
| Members of the public | 6 | 43% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 30 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 17% |
| Other | 3 | 10% |
| Lecturer | 3 | 10% |
| Researcher | 2 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 5 | 17% |
| Unknown | 11 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 10% |
| Arts and Humanities | 2 | 7% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 7% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 8 | 27% |
| Unknown | 11 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 September 2023.
All research outputs
#3,186,368
of 24,946,857 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#580
of 2,175 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64,610
of 424,822 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#12
of 68 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,946,857 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,175 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 424,822 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 68 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.