You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Advancing qualitative rare disease research methodology: a comparison of virtual and in-person focus group formats
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, September 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13023-022-02522-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Andrew A. Dwyer, Melissa Uveges, Samantha Dockray, Neil Smith |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 20% |
| Ireland | 3 | 15% |
| Switzerland | 3 | 15% |
| United States | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 9 | 45% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 13 | 65% |
| Scientists | 5 | 25% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 16 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 2 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 13% |
| Other | 1 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 6% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 2 | 13% |
| Unknown | 7 | 44% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 3 | 19% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 19% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 6% |
| Mathematics | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 8 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 September 2022.
All research outputs
#2,405,581
of 24,525,534 outputs
Outputs from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#303
of 2,926 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,061
of 422,900 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#8
of 87 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,525,534 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,926 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 422,900 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 87 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.