You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The relationship between self-rated health and objective health status: a population-based study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, April 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-13-320 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Shunquan Wu, Rui Wang, Yanfang Zhao, Xiuqiang Ma, Meijing Wu, Xiaoyan Yan, Jia He |
| Abstract |
Self-rated health (SRH), a subjective assessment of health status, is extensively used in the public health field. However, whether SRH can reflect the objective health status is still debatable. We aim to reveal the relationship between SRH and objective health status in the general population. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 25% |
| Colombia | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
| Scientists | 1 | 25% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 413 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 410 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 74 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 62 | 15% |
| Researcher | 52 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 45 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 26 | 6% |
| Other | 61 | 15% |
| Unknown | 93 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 70 | 17% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 68 | 16% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 38 | 9% |
| Psychology | 37 | 9% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 19 | 5% |
| Other | 55 | 13% |
| Unknown | 126 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 January 2020.
All research outputs
#5,866,754
of 23,881,329 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#5,796
of 15,466 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,409
of 201,575 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#94
of 293 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,881,329 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,466 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 201,575 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 293 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.