You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Usage and cost-effectiveness of elective oocyte freezing: a retrospective observational study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology, August 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12958-022-00996-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ih-Jane Yang, Ming-Yih Wu, Kuang-Han Chao, Shin-Yi Wei, Yi-Yi Tsai, Ting-Chi Huang, Mei-Jou Chen, Shee-Uan Chen |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 17 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 24% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 6% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 6% |
| Researcher | 1 | 6% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 9 | 53% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 18% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 12% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 6% |
| Engineering | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 9 | 53% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 September 2022.
All research outputs
#7,661,332
of 23,322,966 outputs
Outputs from Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology
#296
of 1,002 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#133,251
of 405,116 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology
#10
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,322,966 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,002 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 405,116 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.