You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
PEEP-FiO2 table versus EIT to titrate PEEP in mechanically ventilated patients with COVID-19-related ARDS
|
---|---|
Published in |
Critical Care, September 2022
|
DOI | 10.1186/s13054-022-04135-5 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Peter Somhorst, Philip van der Zee, Henrik Endeman, Diederik Gommers |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Japan | 2 | 12% |
Mexico | 2 | 12% |
Malaysia | 1 | 6% |
Colombia | 1 | 6% |
United States | 1 | 6% |
Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 6% |
Peru | 1 | 6% |
Spain | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 7 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 13 | 76% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 12% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 12% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 23 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 13% |
Researcher | 3 | 13% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 9% |
Unspecified | 2 | 9% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 9% |
Other | 3 | 13% |
Unknown | 8 | 35% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 30% |
Unspecified | 2 | 9% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 9% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 4% |
Environmental Science | 1 | 4% |
Other | 2 | 9% |
Unknown | 8 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 October 2022.
All research outputs
#2,131,997
of 25,392,582 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#1,888
of 6,558 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,289
of 432,800 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#53
of 93 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,582 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,558 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 432,800 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 93 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.