↓ Skip to main content

The prognostic significance of nutritional status using malnutrition universal screening tool in patients with pulmonary tuberculosis

Overview of attention for article published in Nutrition Journal, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
36 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
149 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The prognostic significance of nutritional status using malnutrition universal screening tool in patients with pulmonary tuberculosis
Published in
Nutrition Journal, April 2013
DOI 10.1186/1475-2891-12-42
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shigeru Miyata, Mikio Tanaka, Daizo Ihaku

Abstract

Malnutrition is frequently observed in patients with pulmonary tuberculosis (TB). The present study aimed to examine the relationship between nutritional status using Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool (MUST) and the mortality of patients with pulmonary TB.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 149 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Ecuador 1 <1%
Nigeria 1 <1%
Unknown 146 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 25 17%
Student > Master 24 16%
Researcher 14 9%
Student > Postgraduate 14 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 5%
Other 28 19%
Unknown 36 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 68 46%
Nursing and Health Professions 24 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 2%
Other 12 8%
Unknown 33 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 July 2013.
All research outputs
#13,382,001
of 22,705,019 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition Journal
#1,019
of 1,423 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#106,511
of 199,277 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition Journal
#34
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,705,019 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,423 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.1. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 199,277 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.