You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The validity and reliability of the OneStep smartphone application under various gait conditions in healthy adults with feasibility in clinical practice
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, September 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13018-022-03300-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jesse C. Christensen, Ethan C. Stanley, Evan G. Oro, Hunter B. Carlson, Yuval Y. Naveh, Rotem Shalita, Levi S. Teitz |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 23 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 9% |
| Librarian | 1 | 4% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 4% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 15 | 65% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 9% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 4% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 16 | 70% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 August 2023.
All research outputs
#13,641,606
of 24,330,936 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
#412
of 1,513 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#158,168
of 421,308 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
#4
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,330,936 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,513 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 421,308 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.