↓ Skip to main content

Review on the transmission porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus between pigs and farms and impact on vaccination

Overview of attention for article published in Veterinary Research, October 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
6 X users
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
140 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
218 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Review on the transmission porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus between pigs and farms and impact on vaccination
Published in
Veterinary Research, October 2016
DOI 10.1186/s13567-016-0391-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Emanuela Pileri, Enric Mateu

Abstract

Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome (PRRS) is considered to be one of the most costly diseases affecting intensive pig production worldwide. Control of PRRS is a complex issue and involves a combination of measures including monitoring, diagnosis, biosecurity, herd management, and immunization. In spite of the numerous studies dealing with PRRS virus epidemiology, transmission of the infection is still not fully understood. The present article reviews the current knowledge on PRRSV transmission between and within farm, and the impact of vaccination on virus transmission.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 218 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Denmark 2 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Unknown 213 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 32 15%
Researcher 31 14%
Student > Bachelor 29 13%
Student > Master 23 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 7%
Other 28 13%
Unknown 60 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 73 33%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 33 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 15 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 12 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 4%
Other 13 6%
Unknown 64 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 October 2018.
All research outputs
#3,407,792
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Veterinary Research
#134
of 1,337 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,307
of 320,679 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Veterinary Research
#4
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,337 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 320,679 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.