You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Implementing personalised care planning for older people with frailty: a process evaluation of the PROSPER feasibility trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Geriatrics, September 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12877-022-03426-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nicky Kime, Alan Wright, Anne Heaven, Rebecca Hawkins, Jane Smith, Bonnie Cundill, Robbie Foy, Rebecca Lawton, Amanda Farrin, Claire Hulme, Andrew Clegg |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 33 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 15 | 45% |
| Spain | 1 | 3% |
| Australia | 1 | 3% |
| Brazil | 1 | 3% |
| France | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 14 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 19 | 58% |
| Scientists | 7 | 21% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 18% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 28 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 4 | 14% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 4% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 11% |
| Unknown | 16 | 57% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 25% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 14% |
| Psychology | 1 | 4% |
| Engineering | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 15 | 54% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 September 2022.
All research outputs
#1,734,044
of 25,782,917 outputs
Outputs from BMC Geriatrics
#343
of 3,718 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,256
of 422,302 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Geriatrics
#6
of 126 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,782,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,718 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 422,302 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 126 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.