You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Analysis of RNA base modification and structural rearrangement by single-molecule real-time detection of reverse transcription
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Nanobiotechnology, April 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1477-3155-11-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Igor D Vilfan, Yu-Chih Tsai, Tyson A Clark, Jeffrey Wegener, Qing Dai, Chengqi Yi, Tao Pan, Stephen W Turner, Jonas Korlach |
| Abstract |
Zero-mode waveguides (ZMWs) are photonic nanostructures that create highly confined optical observation volumes, thereby allowing single-molecule-resolved biophysical studies at relatively high concentrations of fluorescent molecules. This principle has been successfully applied in single-molecule, real-time (SMRT®) DNA sequencing for the detection of DNA sequences and DNA base modifications. In contrast, RNA sequencing methods cannot provide sequence and RNA base modifications concurrently as they rely on complementary DNA (cDNA) synthesis by reverse transcription followed by sequencing of cDNA. Thus, information on RNA modifications is lost during the process of cDNA synthesis. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 35% |
| Canada | 2 | 12% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 12% |
| Norway | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 6 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 8 | 47% |
| Members of the public | 8 | 47% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 224 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 219 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 53 | 24% |
| Researcher | 46 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 22 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 6% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 9 | 4% |
| Other | 26 | 12% |
| Unknown | 54 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 63 | 28% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 57 | 25% |
| Chemistry | 11 | 5% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 4% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 6 | 3% |
| Other | 20 | 9% |
| Unknown | 58 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 March 2021.
All research outputs
#1,677,054
of 22,660,862 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Nanobiotechnology
#44
of 1,384 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,436
of 199,762 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Nanobiotechnology
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,660,862 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,384 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 199,762 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them