You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The glycocalyx affects the mechanotransductive perception of the topographical microenvironment
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Nanobiotechnology, September 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12951-022-01585-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Matteo Chighizola, Tania Dini, Stefania Marcotti, Mirko D’Urso, Claudio Piazzoni, Francesca Borghi, Anita Previdi, Laura Ceriani, Claudia Folliero, Brian Stramer, Cristina Lenardi, Paolo Milani, Alessandro Podestà, Carsten Schulte |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 38 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 7 | 18% |
| Italy | 5 | 13% |
| United States | 4 | 11% |
| Germany | 3 | 8% |
| Belgium | 2 | 5% |
| France | 1 | 3% |
| Mexico | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 15 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 22 | 58% |
| Members of the public | 15 | 39% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 18 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 22% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 11% |
| Researcher | 2 | 11% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 7 | 39% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 28% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 2 | 11% |
| Chemical Engineering | 1 | 6% |
| Neuroscience | 1 | 6% |
| Chemistry | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 8 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 April 2024.
All research outputs
#1,675,313
of 25,721,020 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Nanobiotechnology
#57
of 2,001 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,007
of 436,784 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Nanobiotechnology
#3
of 100 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,721,020 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,001 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 436,784 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 100 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.