You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Evaluation of DNA damage induced by ionizing radiation from myocardial perfusion imaging: a pilot study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders, September 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12872-022-02839-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Anna Paula Arpini, Andrea De Lorenzo, Aniele Moritz, Julia Passarelli Pereira, Glauber Monteiro Dias |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 5 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 20% |
| Researcher | 1 | 20% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 2 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 40% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 2 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 September 2022.
All research outputs
#2,356,191
of 23,376,718 outputs
Outputs from BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
#81
of 1,691 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,894
of 434,486 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
#1
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,376,718 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,691 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 434,486 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.