You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Implementation fidelity in a multifaceted program to foster rational antibiotics use in primary care: an observational study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Research Methodology, September 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12874-022-01725-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lukas Kühn, Dorothea Kronsteiner, Petra Kaufmann-Kolle, Edith Andres, Joachim Szecsenyi, Michel Wensing, Regina Poss-Doering |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 15 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 3 | 20% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 13% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 13% |
| Professor | 1 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 5 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 20% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 20% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 13% |
| Psychology | 1 | 7% |
| Engineering | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 5 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 September 2022.
All research outputs
#19,231,808
of 24,489,824 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#1,811
of 2,174 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#293,359
of 425,480 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#40
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,489,824 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,174 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 425,480 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.