You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The reliability of and agreement between devices used to measure eccentric hamstring strength: a systematic review protocol
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Systematic Reviews, September 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13643-022-02070-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Daniel Torpey, Eoghan Murray, Tom Hughes, Jamie Sergeant, Michael Callaghan |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 50% |
| Spain | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 29 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 3 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 10% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 3% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 19 | 66% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 3 | 10% |
| Sports and Recreations | 3 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 7% |
| Energy | 1 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 18 | 62% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 September 2022.
All research outputs
#7,587,895
of 23,393,453 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#1,313
of 2,032 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#141,757
of 437,238 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#31
of 64 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,393,453 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,032 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.9. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,238 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 64 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.