↓ Skip to main content

Why Turner patients with 45, X monosomy should not be excluded from fertility preservation services

Overview of attention for article published in Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology, September 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (61st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Why Turner patients with 45, X monosomy should not be excluded from fertility preservation services
Published in
Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology, September 2022
DOI 10.1186/s12958-022-01015-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

MJ Schleedoorn, K Fleischer, DDM Braat, AJM Oerlemans, AAEM van der Velden, R Peek

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 11 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 1 9%
Professor 1 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 9%
Researcher 1 9%
Student > Postgraduate 1 9%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 6 55%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 36%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 9%
Unknown 6 55%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 January 2024.
All research outputs
#8,730,805
of 25,848,962 outputs
Outputs from Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology
#352
of 1,145 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#155,908
of 437,080 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology
#12
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,848,962 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,145 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,080 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.