↓ Skip to main content

The effects of business practices, licensing, and intellectual property on development and dissemination of the polymerase chain reaction: case study

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Biomedical Discovery and Collaboration, July 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
3 X users
wikipedia
10 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
42 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
129 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The effects of business practices, licensing, and intellectual property on development and dissemination of the polymerase chain reaction: case study
Published in
Journal of Biomedical Discovery and Collaboration, July 2006
DOI 10.1186/1747-5333-1-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Joe Fore, Ilse R Wiechers, Robert Cook-Deegan

Abstract

Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was a seminal genomic technology discovered, developed, and patented in an industry setting. Since the first of its core patents expired in March, 2005, we are in a position to view the entire lifespan of the patent, examining how the intellectual property rights have impacted its use in the biomedical community. Given its essential role in the world of molecular biology and its commercial success, the technology can serve as a case study for evaluating the effects of patenting biological research tools on biomedical research.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 129 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 8 6%
Portugal 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Uzbekistan 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Unknown 116 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 22 17%
Student > Master 19 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 12%
Other 14 11%
Student > Bachelor 14 11%
Other 24 19%
Unknown 21 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 42 33%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 19 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 4%
Social Sciences 4 3%
Other 23 18%
Unknown 25 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 51. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 March 2023.
All research outputs
#822,238
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Biomedical Discovery and Collaboration
#1
of 14 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,238
of 88,467 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Biomedical Discovery and Collaboration
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one scored the same or higher as 13 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 88,467 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them