You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
CRAC: an integrated approach to the analysis of RNA-seq reads
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Genome Biology, March 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/gb-2013-14-3-r30 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nicolas Philippe, Mikaël Salson, Thérèse Commes, Eric Rivals |
| Abstract |
A large number of RNA-sequencing studies set out to predict mutations, splice junctions or fusion RNAs. We propose a method, CRAC, that integrates genomic locations and local coverage to enable such predictions to be made directly from RNA-seq read analysis. A k-mer profiling approach detects candidate mutations, indels and splice or chimeric junctions in each single read. CRAC increases precision compared with existing tools, reaching 99:5% for splice junctions, without losing sensitivity. Importantly, CRAC predictions improve with read length. In cancer libraries, CRAC recovered 74% of validated fusion RNAs and predicted novel recurrent chimeric junctions. CRAC is available at http://crac.gforge.inria.fr. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 243 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 8 | 3% |
| France | 7 | 3% |
| Germany | 4 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 2% |
| Norway | 2 | <1% |
| Korea, Republic of | 2 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Slovenia | 1 | <1% |
| Philippines | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 213 | 88% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 73 | 30% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 59 | 24% |
| Student > Master | 32 | 13% |
| Other | 17 | 7% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 9 | 4% |
| Other | 32 | 13% |
| Unknown | 21 | 9% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 126 | 52% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 43 | 18% |
| Computer Science | 25 | 10% |
| Engineering | 7 | 3% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 2% |
| Other | 9 | 4% |
| Unknown | 27 | 11% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 May 2017.
All research outputs
#2,567,662
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Genome Biology
#2,059
of 4,467 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,862
of 210,247 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Biology
#23
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,467 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 210,247 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.