You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Twitter Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Gender differences in the use of insecticide-treated nets after a universal free distribution campaign in Kano State, Nigeria: post-campaign survey results
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Malaria Journal, April 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1475-2875-12-119 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ashley E Garley, Elizabeth Ivanovich, Erin Eckert, Svetlana Negroustoueva, Yazoume Ye |
| Abstract |
Recent expansion in insecticide-treated net (ITN) distribution strategies range from targeting pregnant women and children under five and distributing ITN at antenatal care and immunization programmes, to providing free distribution campaigns to cover an entire population. These changes in strategy raise issues of disparities, such as equity of access and equality in ITN use among different groups, including females and males. Analysis is needed to assess the effects of gender on uptake of key malaria control interventions. A recent post-universal free ITN distribution campaign survey in Kano State, Nigeria offered an opportunity to look at gender effects on ITN use. |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 36% |
| United States | 2 | 18% |
| Indonesia | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 4 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 148 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nigeria | 3 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 144 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 42 | 28% |
| Researcher | 19 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 11 | 7% |
| Other | 28 | 19% |
| Unknown | 21 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 50 | 34% |
| Social Sciences | 19 | 13% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 14 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 7% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 21 | 14% |
| Unknown | 29 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2021.
All research outputs
#3,060,350
of 24,289,456 outputs
Outputs from Malaria Journal
#709
of 5,804 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,473
of 202,942 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Malaria Journal
#9
of 72 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,289,456 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,804 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 202,942 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 72 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.