You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Optimal target blood pressure in elderly with septic shock (OPTPRESS) trial: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Trials, September 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13063-022-06732-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Akira Endo, Kazuma Yamakawa, Takashi Tagami, Yutaka Umemura, Kyosuke Takahashi, Hiroki Nagasawa, Yuichi Araki, Mitsuaki Kojima, Toshiki Sera, Masayuki Yagi, Ryo Yamamoto, Jiro Takahashi, Masaki Nakane, Chikashi Takeda, Chihiro Narita, Satoshi Kazuma, Hiroko Okura, Hiroyuki Takahashi, Takeshi Wada, Shu Tahara, Ayaka Matsuoka, Todani Masaki, Atsushi Shiraishi, Keiichiro Shimoyama, Yuta Yokokawa, Rintaro Nakamura, Hisako Sageshima, Yuichiro Yanagida, Kunihiko Takahashi, Yasuhiro Otomo |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 2 | 25% |
| France | 2 | 25% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 3 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 75% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 18 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 1 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 6% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 6% |
| Researcher | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 2 | 11% |
| Unknown | 11 | 61% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 28% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 6% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 11 | 61% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 October 2022.
All research outputs
#8,784,726
of 25,988,468 outputs
Outputs from Trials
#871
of 1,868 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#156,894
of 439,370 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Trials
#5
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,988,468 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,868 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 439,370 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.