↓ Skip to main content

A cost-effectiveness analysis of capecitabine maintenance therapy versus routine follow-up for early-stage triple-negative breast cancer patients after standard treatment from a perspective of…

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medicine, September 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
14 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A cost-effectiveness analysis of capecitabine maintenance therapy versus routine follow-up for early-stage triple-negative breast cancer patients after standard treatment from a perspective of Chinese society
Published in
BMC Medicine, September 2022
DOI 10.1186/s12916-022-02516-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ji-Bin Li, Zhuo-Chen Lin, Martin C. S. Wong, Harry H. X. Wang, Mengmeng Li, Su Li

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 14 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 1 7%
Student > Bachelor 1 7%
Student > Master 1 7%
Unknown 11 79%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 7%
Social Sciences 1 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 7%
Unknown 11 79%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 September 2022.
All research outputs
#14,645,319
of 23,443,716 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medicine
#3,013
of 3,533 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#204,922
of 438,628 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medicine
#138
of 168 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,443,716 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,533 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 44.6. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 438,628 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 168 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.