↓ Skip to main content

Assessing the similarity of mental models of operating room team members and implications for patient safety: a prospective, replicated study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Education, August 2016
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
36 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
121 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Assessing the similarity of mental models of operating room team members and implications for patient safety: a prospective, replicated study
Published in
BMC Medical Education, August 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12909-016-0752-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ivana Nakarada-Kordic, Jennifer M. Weller, Craig S. Webster, David Cumin, Christopher Frampton, Matt Boyd, Alan F. Merry

Abstract

Patient safety depends on effective teamwork. The similarity of team members' mental models - or their shared understanding-regarding clinical tasks is likely to influence the effectiveness of teamwork. Mental models have not been measured in the complex, high-acuity environment of the operating room (OR), where professionals of different backgrounds must work together to achieve the best surgical outcome for each patient. Therefore, we aimed to explore the similarity of mental models of task sequence and of responsibility for task within multidisciplinary OR teams. We developed a computer-based card sorting tool (Momento) to capture the information on mental models in 20 six-person surgical teams, each comprised of three subteams (anaesthesia, surgery, and nursing) for two simulated laparotomies. Team members sorted 20 cards depicting key tasks according to when in the procedure each task should be performed, and which subteam was primarily responsible for each task. Within each OR team and subteam, we conducted pairwise comparisons of scores to arrive at mean similarity scores for each task. Mean similarity score for task sequence was 87 % (range 57-97 %). Mean score for responsibility for task was 70 % (range = 38-100 %), but for half of the tasks was only 51 % (range = 38-69 %). Participants believed their own subteam was primarily responsible for approximately half the tasks in each procedure. We found differences in the mental models of some OR team members about responsibility for and order of certain tasks in an emergency laparotomy. Momento is a tool that could help elucidate and better align the mental models of OR team members about surgical procedures and thereby improve teamwork and outcomes for patients.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 121 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 121 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 19 16%
Researcher 15 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 10%
Student > Master 12 10%
Other 9 7%
Other 30 25%
Unknown 24 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 36 30%
Nursing and Health Professions 21 17%
Psychology 6 5%
Social Sciences 5 4%
Computer Science 4 3%
Other 19 16%
Unknown 30 25%